How Incremental Change Threatens Brands - Branding Strategy Insider (2024)

Everybody is looking for radical change, not incremental improvements.

Brands still haven’t realized this: They focus on minor tweaks and operate incremental course corrections. It’s worked before; why wouldn’t it continue to work?

But the environment has changed. Today’s threats employ discontinuity as a strategy. They don’t think incrementally. The only word they can spell is disruption. The only way to get ahead of disruption is to dump incrementalism, stop following the herd, and go against the flow.

I’ve spent my career in airports. Over the years, I’ve learned how to travel by plane. I have a long list of tips and tricks. Here’s one: if you’re late for a connection and you have to run to your gate, run against the oncoming crowds, not with the people heading in the same direction as you.

If you run with the flow of the crowds, nobody knows you’re coming up from behind them, so they just take up space and slow you down. If you run against the flow, you’re running towards people. They’ll see you, and they’ll scatter, and then you’ll have the running room you need to make your flight.

Same for your brands. Today, if brands just go with the flow, they’ll move incrementally, one small step at a time – and they’ll arrive too late.

People are getting used to radical change. A Swedish rail company started allowing commuters to pay for travel using embedded microchips. A Wisconsin company, Three Square Market, offered employees the chance to have chips implanted which can be used to open doors, buy snacks, log into computers and use the copy machines.

This isn’t incremental change. This is change which can’t be undone. There is no going back.

Incremental change isn’t working anymore. Research shows the amount you need to invest in product innovation is becoming uneconomic for larger brand-owning companies. While many CPG product launches could be runaway successes for small challenger companies, for big brand owners they are just small potatoes and they don’t deliver game-winning plays.

Global brands can’t compete efficiently at a small scale – it’s Asymmetric Warfare on the business battlefield. Global brands can’t win because of the relative return on investment.

Stanford University Researchers researching innovation in the U.S. since the 1930s found that the investment required to discover or invent a new good idea is higher than ever, but the return is lower. That’s not enough for big brands: a little bit more of the same guarantees falling behind.

The easy gains of the past are gone. There is no return to them. The future of consumption demands that big brands break away from the crowd. The only way out of the innovation trap is to find the rule-breaking innovations, the ones that go against the flow.

Several companies have shown the way in big ways.

  • Volvo went against the flow when it announced that it would stop selling gas or diesel-powered cars.
  • Unilever bought Dollar Shave Club to challenge Gillette with a business model unlike anything it’s done before and unlike anything in the category.
  • Amazon’s $13.7 billion bid for Whole Foods drove an immediate jump in the internet giant’s share price, which more than covered the acquisition cost – in effect, Amazon bought Whole Foods for free. It promptly slashed prices for organic food, relying on its technology and delivery expertise to offset any lost margin.
  • Rival retailer Best Buy matched all prices, including Amazon’s, dropped certain product lines to make room for Microsoft, Samsung and Verizon to open stores within its stores, cut costs, and reinvested in services – improved website and phone app, training for salespeople, expanded Geek Squad and in-home consultations to help people integrate their technologies.

You cannot change business models incrementally. Incrementalism won’t blunt the momentum of disruptive competitors. You cannot get ahead of creative destruction incrementally.

You have to radically change course – even if it means running against the crowd.

Contributed to Branding Strategy Insider By Walker Smith, Chief Knowledge Officer, Brand & Marketing at Kantar

The Blake Project Can Help You Create A Brighter Competitive Future In The Jobs To Be Done Workshop

Branding Strategy Insider is a service of The Blake Project: A strategic brand consultancy specializing in Brand Research, Brand Strategy, Brand Growth and Brand Education

FREE Publications And Resources For Marketers

Post Views: 44

How Incremental Change Threatens Brands - Branding Strategy Insider (2024)

FAQs

What does brand strategy mean? ›

A brand strategy is a framework that determines how businesses present themselves to customers and stand out among competitors. Your business's brand is more than just its name, logo, fonts, and colors.

What do you mean by brand building strategy? ›

Define your target audience and research competitors.

Conducting a comprehensive analysis of ideal customers and competitors is a must for every successful brand. Direct your efforts to explore the market. You need to identify and describe your ideal customer and define the level of competition.

What are the brand development strategies? ›

A brand development strategy is a long-term plan devised by companies to be desirable and identifiable by customers. A brand development strategy should ideally include the brand's promise, its identity, and its mission. Marketers must align brand strategy with the business's overall mission.

What are the 4 C's of brand strategy? ›

The 4 C's of Marketing are Customer, Cost, Convenience, and Communication. These 4C's determine whether a company is likely to succeed or fail in the long run. The customer is the heart of any marketing strategy. If the customer doesn't buy your product or service, you're unlikely to turn a profit.

What is the most commonly used branding strategy? ›

1. Product Branding Strategy. Product branding is a type of branding strategy that aims to create a recognizable brand for a specific product, with the goal of reaching the company's target market.

What is the primary focus of a branding strategy? ›

The client is the primary focus of a brand strategy, as well as the means through which the brand may establish a distinct and appealing position in the mind of the consumer.

What is an example of a branding strategy? ›

For example, a car manufacturing company might decide to launch a lawnmower company under the same brand name. By leveraging the brand it's established for vehicles, the organization is able to become a well-known lawnmower brand as well.

What is a branding strategy example? ›

Symbols or graphics are an important aspect of product branding since they help customers instantly recognize your goods. For example, an energy drink company might use distinct packaging and emblems on all its products to set the brand apart from other energy drinks.

What is a brand strategy roadmap? ›

A brand strategy is a roadmap to understand the market, your role in the market and how to gain a greater share by satisfying customer needs. Brand-building strategies include your story, voice, values, mission, audience, differentiators and visual representation.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Barbera Armstrong

Last Updated:

Views: 5677

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (59 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Barbera Armstrong

Birthday: 1992-09-12

Address: Suite 993 99852 Daugherty Causeway, Ritchiehaven, VT 49630

Phone: +5026838435397

Job: National Engineer

Hobby: Listening to music, Board games, Photography, Ice skating, LARPing, Kite flying, Rugby

Introduction: My name is Barbera Armstrong, I am a lovely, delightful, cooperative, funny, enchanting, vivacious, tender person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.